Historical inaccuracies in the book of mormon

What do mormons believe about the bible and the book of. Is the book of mormon an authentic ancient history of ancient american peoples, or a work of 19th century religious fiction. Many members of the latter day saint movement claim historical authenticity of the book of mormon. I have a large library of religious books, but the annotated edition of the book of mormon is the most technicolored, highfidelity, highdefinition, highlyresearched, testimonybuilding, multidimensional rollercoaster ride through the religious history. The book of mormon is a religious record of three groups of people who migrated from the old world to the american continents. Variations of this theory only include that the text is a divinely inspired narrative, regardless of its.

No woman, except perhaps the wife of king lamoni, in the book of mormon is portrayed as having her own independent connection with heaven. Some have attempted to separate the historical claims made in the book of mormon with its theology. The book of mormon records the visit of jesus christ to people in the americas following his resurrection. This is important because the latterday saints make such a point about it containing the fullness of. Below is the modern map of the area of smiths youth. The main scripture they use to support this claim is ezekiel 37. Apologetics press the book of mormon and the ancient. Is christ god, the eternal father do we worship jesus how did the name lucifer get into the bible and, how did it end up in the book of mormon why is the definition of grace in the book of mormon so different from the definition of grace in the bible we will discover the answer to these questions today. In entertainment, they call these plotholes, tropes, plotarmor, etc. Historical errors in the book of mormon catholic apologetics. Second, the book of mormon contains none of the key mormon doctrines.

While the bible has a wealth of evidence supporting its historical, chronological, and geographical accuracy, the book of mormon has been heavily criticized for its inaccuracies. Mormon church publishes its first official history in nearly a century, and the result is an easytoread volume that tackles some hard facts. The book of mormon is rife with narrative issues, which are problems from the actual story, context, history, etc. Unlike the book of mormon, the bible contains no historical inaccuracies.

If this is true, then the book of mormon should be full of errors. Many members of the latter day saint movement claim historical authenticity of the book of. This is important because the latterday saints make such a point about it containing the fullness of the everlasting gospel. If that were the claim of the book of mormon, any piece of historical, archaeological, or linguistic evidence to the contrary would weigh in against the book of mormon, and those who rely exclusively on scholarship would have a promising position to argue. Mormonism is a religion less than two centuries old, but in this short time it has managed to accrue a long list of embarrassments which the church leaders would prefer were kept. Most, but not all, mormons hold the book s connection to ancient american history as an article of their faith. The book of mormon does indeed have authentic semitic constructions in it, but lds need to tread cautiously in establishing them. My wife kept a count of victories for satan uses of. The accounts of these witnesses are printed in each copy of the book of mormon but the song makes no mention of them. Joseph smith claimed that the book of mormon, published in 1830, had been translated from golden plates that contained the accounts of the ancient inhabitants of the american continent. Moroni, the last of the nephite prophethistorians, sealed up the abridged records of these people and hid them in about a.

Note i am asking this question as someone who has not actually read the book of mormon. The latest in signature bookss essays on mormonism series, american apocrypha combines the insights of nine different authors in a comprehensive study of the book of mormon, its role in history, and the way religious communities use sacred texts create meaning and culture. The book itself claims to be an ancient record of gods dealings with a remnant of the house of israel in the new world. Church admits book of mormon not history and to go to lengths to translate the words he wants so that he can be redundant as if saying that it is a miraculous miracle somehow makes it even better than anyone might have thought otherwise. Excluding the bible and similar writing, can you prove to an atheist or to someone that is agnostic that god exists. Assuming the book of mormon is historically accurate, does this necessarily imply the great apostasy. Now, as an atheist archaeologist of jewish descent who works closely with various native american tribes and clans, i hang onto my old, beatup copy of this book just to show my indian. Joseph smith consistently claimed that he translated the book of mormon from a set of ancient golden plates which were delivered to him by an angel. Even though it claims to be the wordforword translation joseph smith received by revelation, there have been 3,9 changes in the book of mormon. A wellknown instance is the reference to a clock in shakespeares julius caesar.

Not only does an increase in the frequency of anachronisms increase the probability that a work is not historically accurate, but the nature in which the. The list of archaeological and historical claims of the. There are differing views on the origin of the book of mormon. These groups were led by prophets who recorded their religious and secular histories on metal plates. They encourage potential converts to follow suit so that they, too, may know the book of mormon is from god. This site provides you with an overview of what the book of mormon claims from an archeological or historic viewpoint, and compares it to nonapologetic apologetic meaning speak to defend scientific and historical resources. Debunking 5 myths about the book of mormon lds living. The book of mormon is supposed to be a history of real people living in a real place. According to joseph smith and subsequent presidents and apostles of the lds church, the geographical extent of book of mormon lands included virtually all of north and south america.

However, after a fair and candid examination of the evidence, many thousands of. The book of mormon bom was first published in palmyra, new york, in 1830, its title page giving the name joseph smith, jun. First, it utterly lacks historical or archaeological support, and there is overwhelming empirical evidence that refutes it. The word of yahweh was addressed to me as follows, son of man, take a stick and write on it, judah and those israelites loyal to. Yet, the book of mormon musical also contains less benign inaccuracies, like misrepresenting joseph smiths history, distorting mormon. I could have made this number much higher by simply counting every single scene from the book of mormon as a historical inaccuracy but i kept my tally to modern history. Joseph smith said that the book of mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to god by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book history of the church, vol. The theory that the book of mormon is an ancient american history is not accepted as scientifically verifiable by the mainstream. For the first 150 years of mormonisms existence, everyone thought it was a story about a people who left the middle east and came to south or central america, and who fought wars clear up into new york state where.

Assuming the book of mormon is historically accurate, does this. The list of archeological and historical claims of the book of mormon compared to nonapologetic evidence. I guess my real question is, could i affirm the historical accuracy of the book of mormon as a catholic. How does one distinguish between a document that is genuine and authentic and one that is not. Serious study of the book of mormon by latterday saints is flourishing today as never before. Third, the book of mormon abounds in textual errors, factual errors, and outright plagiarisms from other works. A book of mistakes, error, and fraud by jon gary williams introduction the mormon church promotes the book of mormon as an inspired writing. However, a close examination of this book shows a long llist of problems, one of which is the presence of anachronisms. The book is divided into smaller books that read as narratives. An example would be a reference to an event that had not yet occurred, or mention of objects or materials which did not yet exist. Books about mormons score a books total score is based on multiple factors, including the number of people who have voted for it and how highly those voters ranked the book.

It was first published in 1830 in palmyra, new york, and was thereafter widely reprinted and translated. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. The book of mormon claims to be a history of ancient peoples inhabiting central. The outline below identifies the major historical inaccuracies and problems that the church tends to ignore or obscure and that the original founders of mormonthink thought needed to be more transparent and fully disclosed by the church.

Miraculous origins theories generally accept joseph smiths own account, that he translated an ancient record compiled and abridged by mormon, a precolumbian resident of the western hemisphere. Top 10 embarrassments of the mormon religion listverse. It tells of the jaredites, people from the tower of babel who came to central america but perished because of their own immorality. Book of mormon, work accepted as holy scripture, in addition to the bible, in the church of jesus christ of latterday saints and other mormon churches. Mormon included in his compilation the first six books as they were written. The book of mormon comprises fifteen books, each named after its principal writer. In the old world, documents have been able to assist some of this task, but in the new world we are left with the problem of reconstructing a. According to the book of mormon, jesus christ appeared and preached to the nephites in the americas after his crucifixion. It is either of divine or human origin, and if it is of human origin that means that joseph smith concocted the book. This is what drove the content for the original site.

Historical linguistics looks at what the putative indoeuropean language might have been like to lead to the many languages now assigned to that family. The mormon church the church of jesus christ of latterday saints. An anachronism is defined as an event that appears out of time. The book of mormon is supposed to be the account of people who came from the middleeast to the americas. Contrary to the musicals portrayal, historical records indicate that at least 11 people signed testimonies indicating that smith had shown them the golden plates. As a result, the prophet joseph smith provided more accurate. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in. Why you shouldnt ask god if the book of mormon is true. The dominant and widely accepted view among latter day saints is that the book of mormon is a true and accurate account of these ancient. Let alone proof, theres not even any good evidence or argument that book of mormon stories are true or historically accurate. Book of mormon difficulties, contradictions and explanations.

Mormon missionaries regularly quote this verse and accompany it with heartfelt personal testimony about how the holy ghost bore witness to them of the truth of the book of mormon. A twohundredyear era of peace followed that visit of christ. Why is the book of mormons historical authenticity so. Historicity of the book of mormon book of mormon evidence. There are two possible explanations for the origin of the book of mormon. Only three female characters are named in the book of mormon sariah the wife of lehi, abish the lamanite woman, isabel the harlot, compared to 188 in the bible. Published in 1930, the book of mormon acts as a modernday. Mormon church publishes its first official history in. This view finds no acceptance outside of mormonism. When lehi et al come to america, they bring horses and grains from the old world, including corn.

Chou researched historical inaccuracies in the book of mormon for three years, before sending a 16page resignation letter to the church in 2010, and leaving officially, with his wife and their. Hebraisms that could have been known to joseph smith may still be authentic, and may still enhance our appreciation of the text, but they are weak evidence for book of mormon antiquity. Even at 14 years old and in the early 80s, i recognized most of the historical and scientific inaccuracies. First, you should be aware that not all of mormon doctrine, or even of the things that are generally considered the stuff that makes mormons.

1437 540 591 227 703 1137 583 1474 573 226 353 1094 639 973 1477 862 253 523 752 486 543 1661 533 176 729 320 225 533 507 1134 2 294